Employee vs Employe Which Is More Correct/Common
Employe is a rare dated alternative spelling of the more common employee (AHD) Ngram: an employe. Ngram: an employee vs an employe From French employé. Employe (plural employes). 1920, …
Employees vs Staff - English Language & Usage Stack Exchange
Oct 24, 2017 · This is an example of the very common phenomenon in English (and many other languages for that matter) of having two similar words coming from different origins. Staff is a …
Employee with, for, at - English Language & Usage Stack Exchange
May 18, 2018 · Employee takes only of. You could of course, say "I am employed with" and "I work for", but not "employee for" or "employee with".
grammar - English Language & Usage Stack Exchange
I want to add the following statement in an email: This is being written to confirm that Mr. XYZ has been employed in our organization from September 2013 till date. The "till date" part sounds
grammar - "was employed at" vs "had been employed at" - English ...
Jul 15, 2019 · The past perfect is only used to refer to events that are in the past relative to some expressed or implied viewpoint in the past; and even then, it is often not used if the relative timing is …
What is the proper usage of the phrase "due diligence"?
A lawyer referring to the process of investigating a potential merger/investment might say: We need to perform due diligence. There is also business buzzword of "due diligence", derived from the legal …
etymology - How and when did 'performant' enter common usage in …
Feb 12, 2025 · Performant: From perform + -ant (suffix forming agent nouns from verbs, and adjectives from verbs with the senses of ‘doing (the action of the verb’)), possibly modelled after informant. …
What is a one-person business called? - English Language & Usage …
Feb 1, 2011 · I'm wondering what is the term for the person, that is doing business on his/her own and has tax liability. It's different in each country, I'd like to know how they are called in USA and UK.
"Employment with" vs. "employment at" - English Language & Usage …
Which of the following options are correct? [Some context] that is relevant to my employment with the company. [Some context] that is relevant to my employment at the company.
Should it be "concerned person" or "person concerned"?
An office colleague wrote the following in an email: Kindly log a ticket for the same and assign it to the concerned team. I wrote back the following: I believe it should be "Kindly log a tic...